Skip to content
Explore cutting-edge technology trends, expert analyses, an…

Could Different States Emulate Australia's in Restricting Social Platforms for Teenagers Under 16?

The nation's bold policy to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are moving toward similar bans.

  • Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
  • Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options on the table".
  • In The Spanish government, the leader has called on parliament to approve a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
  • The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," commented the MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by strong evidence".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing harmful platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and fit for young users," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is mostly happening at the state level due to federal gridlock.

  • Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
  • Florida has passed a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
  • The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further time requiring parental permission.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws demanding adult authorization for minors to open social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Apart from these regions, other countries are similarly exploring options.

  • Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
  • Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international agencies take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this worldwide debate continues, the actions of Australia and its followers demonstrate that policymakers globally are no longer willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.

About the author

Carol Nelson

Tech enthusiast and writer specializing in AI and emerging technologies.

Smart Core Zone Base

Type to search articles.