Skip to content
Explore cutting-edge technology trends, expert analyses, an…

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Determine Trump's Political Legacy - and the United States' Position in the Global Order

In the wake of executing a night of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be getting into the nation-building arena.

In a remarkable media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief stated that US forces had successfully captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then said that a team including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What exactly "running the country" actually means is ambiguous, but the pledge signifies an dramatic change of course for the president, laden with inconsistencies and significant obstacles.

A leader who campaigned against "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at overthrowing governments and who vowed to implement an "America first" international policy is now staking his presidency on effectively reconstructing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been undermined by years of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was unwaveringly optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He vowed to recruit American energy companies to overhaul Venezuela's deteriorating industrial infrastructure, supplying capital for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has altered Venezuela's prospects – for better or worse.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has shown that he is more than willing to use armed force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike previous operations, which have largely involved missiles and warplanes that reduce the risk of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are strikingly distinct.

His goal, he said during his press conference, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Response at Home and Abroad

That twist on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - slogan could be difficult for some of Trump's backers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump ally who split from the president after accusing him of deserting his core supporters, was swift to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's perpetual military aggression and support of overseas conflicts is justified because we are forced to pay for it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" priorities because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The purpose of the new US security policy, he said, was to "protect trade, territory and assets that are central to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will raise broader questions in international relations, however, and impact American relations with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese government issued a statement voicing shock and denouncing what it said was a reckless assault on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered comparable censures of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often seemed to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, voiced worry about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to excuse their unlawful and barbaric operations against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were more direct.

"The United States should not be running other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have understood by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he condemned Trump's decision not to consult with legislative leaders before launching the attack.

"The President has the legal duty to follow the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First requires."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "leak" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a success – with zero American casualties and minimal damage to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic bravado, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "one of the most astonishing, effective and powerful demonstrations of American power and proficiency in American history."

Now he is staking his legacy on that victory continuing, as the US claims it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unclear. He and his administration must fortify a nation that has been in chaos for years while stabilising a region that is bound to be wary of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

About the author

Carol Nelson

Tech enthusiast and writer specializing in AI and emerging technologies.

Smart Core Zone Base

Type to search articles.